Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gina Feistel vs Petra Csabi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Feistel vs Csabi analysis and find out who is favored!
Gina Feistel vs Petra Csabi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Feistel 1 - 0 Csabi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Feistel has won 46.28% of points on their second serve, while Csabi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Feistel, in recent form, has won 57.13% of their opponent's second serve points, while Csabi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.25% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Feistel has saved 51.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Csabi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Feistel has won 66.13% of matches played (W/L 41/ 21), with Csabi winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Feistel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 43/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3). Csabi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 17/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 34% (W/L 15/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Feistel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/ 16), where as Csabi has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Feistel winning 1 times and Csabi being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Feistel winning 2 and Csabi winning 1. The last match between Feistel and Csabi was at the W25 Jablonec nad Nisou, 13-09-2022, Q3, Clay with Gina Feistel getting the victory 4-6 6-4 10-7.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Feistel and Csabi have played a deciding set 1 times, with Feistel winning 1 times and Csabi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Feistel winning 0, and Csabi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Feistel has played against opponents with an average rank of 285.55 while Csabi has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Feistel has won 72% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Csabi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Feistel has converted 46.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Csabi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
471
Rank
471
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
62% (78-48)
Career Total W/L
44% (38-48)
66% (21-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Gina Feistel vs Petra Csabi For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Feistel VS Csabi
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Gina Feistel | Petra Csabi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 20 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:0 | 2:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (62/84) | 71% (51/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 47% (29/62) | 47% (24/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (12/22) | 43% (9/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 40% (6/15) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (39/72) | 51% (43/84) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 10-7 |
Stats 
Gina Feistel
Player
Petra Csabi
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
51%
(
43 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gina Feistel | Petra Csabi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (21/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (387/334) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 76% (16/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 9 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 100 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 333.13 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1686/2371) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (959/1686) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (317/685) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (163/350) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (1234/2495) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (21/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (9/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (10/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 44% (18/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Gina Feistel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Julie Belgraver
52%
(
56 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
116)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
4
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
58 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ylena In-Albon
Player
Gina Feistel
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Gina Feistel
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
82%
(
83 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
48 of
82)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
77%
(
89 of
116)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
49 of
89)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
112
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
43%
(
16 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Gina Feistel
69%
(
91 of
132)
1st Serve %
71%
(
69 of
97)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
51%
(
46 of
91)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
52%
(
68 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Vivian Wolff
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Victoria Kan
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Petra Csabi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Petra Csabi
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
51%
(
43 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Petra Csabi
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Petra Csabi
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Muntean
Player
Petra Csabi
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiho Shin
Player
Petra Csabi
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cara Maria Mester
Player
Petra Csabi
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
53%
(
44 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikola Daubnerova
Player
Petra Csabi
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petra Csabi
Player
Hana Sokolovic
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
2 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Feistel Vs Csabi Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Feistel are available here and Csabi photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Gina Feistel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
